Ce que Saint François de Sales proclamait 1602

Et nous ferons nôtre ce que Saint François de Sales proclamait dans l’illustre cathédrale Notre-Dame de Paris devant toute la cour royale, à l’occasion de l’oraison funèbre de Philippe-Emmanuel de Lorraine duc de Mercoeur*, le 27 avril 1602 :

« Ah ! que les François sont braves quand ils ont Dieu de leur costé ! qu’ils sont vaillans quand ils sont devots ! qu’ils sont heureux à combattre les Infideles ! Leo qui omnibus insultat animalibus, solos pertimescit gallos, disent les naturalistes. C’est grand cas que la presence de ce capitaine françois ayt peu arrester la course des armes turquesques, et qu’à son aspect leur lune se soit esclipsée. Je m’en resjouys avec vous, ô France ! Et loué soit nostre Dieu, que de vostre arsenal soit sortie une espée si vaillante, et que l’empire soit venu à la queste d’un lieutenant-general à la cour de vostre grand roy, à qui c’est une grande gloire d’estre le plus grand guerrier d’un royaume, duquel sortent des princes qui au reste du monde sont estimés et tenus les premiers. Aussi plusieurs estiment que ce sera un de vos roys, ô France, qui donnera le dernier coup de la ruine à la secte de ce grand imposteur Mahomet. »

Saint François de Sales qui n’était pas français n’avait pas de mal à prêcher cette vérité.

*) « On célébra, l’an 1602, à Paris, où j’étais, les obsèques de ce magnanime prince Philippe-Emmanuel de Lorraine, duc de Mercoeur; lequel avait fait tant de beaux exploits contre les Turcs en Hongrie, que tout le christianisme devait conspirer à l’honneur de sa mémoire .» Saint François de Sales, Oraison funèbre
de Philippe-Emmanuel de Lorraine, Ed. Saint-Remi 2006.

Source: La Voix des Francs - Éditions Saint-Remi

Parla un musulmano convertito a Cristo

Bernardo Cervellera
Facendosi riprendere da una TV a pieno viso - col rischio di essere riconosciuto e perseguito per "apostasia" - Mohammed Christophe riafferma il valore della conversione e del battesimo. Ma diversi vescovi e sacerdoti nei Paesi a maggioranza islamica rifiutano il battesimo ai musulmani che vogliono diventare cristiani. Eppure convertirsi significa una rivoluzione nel rapporto con Dio che è Padre; con Gesù che mi dona la sua vita; abbandonando tutto a rischio di persecuzione e di morte per apostasia.


Roma (AsiaNews) - Nei giorni scorsi il sito di Notre Dame de Kabylie ha diffuso un video in cui un ex musulmano, Mohammed Christophe Bilek, racconta la sua conversione al cristianesimo. Il video è tratto dalla trasmissione "Dieu merci (Grazie a Dio)", sul tema della "Persecuzione dei cristiani", per la catena televisiva Direct 8.
Mohammed Christophe Bilek è nato in Algeria nel 1950 e vive in Francia dal 1961. È l'autore di due libri, "Un algerino non troppo cattolico" (1999, Cerf) e "Sant'Agostino raccontato a mia figlia". Dagli anni '90 egli è anche il responsabile del sito Notre Dame de Kabylie, per l'evangelizzazione dei musulmani e il dialogo islamo-cristiano.
Il video mette in luce il rischio per i musulmani convertiti di essere accusati di apostasia e perdere la vita, ma nonostante ciò l'intervistato ribatte l'importanza del battesimo, dell'incontro con Gesù Cristo e dell'appartenere alla Chiesa.
La testimonianza di Mohammed Christophe cozza contro le considerazioni di sacerdoti e vescovi dei Paesi a maggioranza islamici che, per timore di conseguenze sui convertiti e sulle comunità, preferiscono rallentare o addirittura escludere il battesimo per i musulmani che vogliono convertirsi.
 Proibito battezzare?
 Settimane fa, il vescovo di un Paese del Medio oriente arabo mi raccontava che una delle sue comunità è stata minacciata di chiusura da parte della polizia solo perché i fedeli stavano pubblicizzando un incontro di confronto e dialogo fra cristiani e musulmani. La polizia temeva che questo fosse il primo passo verso il cosiddetto "proselitismo" e "l'apostasia". "Se questa è la reazione a un incontro sul dialogo - concludeva il vescovo con amarezza - figuriamoci quale sarebbe per una conversione!".
A causa di ciò, e per salvare almeno la libertà di culto che si garantisce in quel Paese, il vescovo frena ogni conversione e battesimo.
La situazione è ancora più netta in Marocco - e fino a poco tempo fa in Algeria - dove le diocesi danno chiare indicazioni a non battezzare alcun musulmano che voglia convertirsi al cattolicesimo. Il motivo è che "le leggi del Paese lo proibiscono".
P. Samir Khalil racconta che alcuni anni fa ha incontrato un musulmano che da 13 anni (!) chiedeva di essere battezzato e ciò gli veniva di continuo rifiutato. I sacerdoti spiegavano che il suo battesimo avrebbe portato enormi difficoltà a lui - che per evitare la morte per apostasia avrebbe dovuto emigrare - e al prete che gli avrebbe amministrato il battesimo. Intanto, il povero musulmano si era studiato da solo i vangeli e il catechismo, praticando una vita di preghiera.
Anche in Egitto si tende a frenare le conversioni e a non battezzare, sebbene alcuni sacerdoti mi abbiano confidato di aver amministrato qualche battesimo in segreto. Interrogato da AsiaNews, un religioso da decenni in Egitto ha risposto che voler battezzare a tutti i costi è "contro il Concilio Vaticano II perché il Concilio ha sottolineato la salvezza dei non cristiani anche al di fuori della Chiesa". La conclusione sembra essere: non c'è bisogno di battezzare; ognuno si salva nella condizione in cui è.
Non vale la pena aprire qui un dibattito teologico sulla fede in Cristo e la salvezza dei non cristiani. Del resto, mi sembra che la Dominus Jesus e il documento della Dottrina della fede sul "proselitismo" ribadiscono l'importanza di un'appartenenza anche "sociale", visibile al Cristo e alla Chiesa.
Mi importa sottolineare il fatto che essere battezzato è qualcosa che cambia la vita e la percezione della vita del convertito; il cambiamento avviene ora, nella storia, e non nel futuro di una vita "eterna" dopo la morte. Per questo, offrire il battesimo a chi lo chiede non è una questione di superficie, ma un dono di vita e di speranza già oggi. Non è dunque uguale a zero il bilancio fra essere e non essere battezzati.
 Il Dio "solare" dei cristiani; quello "lunare" del Corano
 La fede cambia il presente in modo profondo e significativo. In un'altra testimonianza riportata su Notre Dame de Kabylie, Mohammed Christophe, spiegando la sua conversione, sottolinea la sua nuova comprensione di Dio.
Il convertito si chiede: "Se il Dio del Corano è lo stesso di quello dei cristiani, perché io, Mohammed, sono divenuto Christophe?" E la risposta è "Avendo vissuto nell'islam, avendo praticato i suoi precetti, circondato da persone ancora oggi musulmane (la mia famiglia si definisce musulmana), io non cesso di essere abbagliato dalla scoperta del Vangelo. La luce che da esso emana può suggerire un paragone, che però suppone una premessa: chi vuol discutere del Dio dell'islam deve riferirsi al Corano. Ed ecco: se si rimpiazza la parola 'Dio' con quella di 'luce', quella del Corano è una luce lunare, quella del vangelo è una luce solare....
In effetti che Dio sia unico, creatore, o qualunque altro nome gli si attribuisca, si può ammetterlo. Ma se ci si ferma a questo postulato, non è necessario abbandonare l'islam per divenire cristiano. Ma Gesù è venuto per rivelare agli ebrei e poi a tutti gli uomini che 'Dio è vostro Padre; Dio vi ama e vi vuole con Lui per donarvi la Sua vita!'. A questo punto io non esito nemmeno un istante: accetto quest'offerta non una sola volta, ma anche due! Del resto io so che [l'offerta] che mi fa il Corano è di meritare forse (perché non c'è garanzia) un paradiso carnale e materialista (s.38, 50-52), tanto da farmi pensare più a una pubblicità di qualche luogo di vacanza e di ozio, sotto il sole dei tropici, ma non mi dà alcuna certezza di 'conoscere' il mio Dio e Signore!".
Mohammed Christophe fa poi un paragone fra la figura di Cristo e quella di Maometto: "E che dire del volto di Cristo e quello di Maometto? Basteranno due citazioni: Gesù (in Giov. 10,11) dice: ' Io sono il buon pastore; il buon pastore dà la vita per le sue pecore'. Maometto (in s.33,47): O profeta! Ti è lecito sposare tutte le donne che hanno la dote; tutte le prigioniere che Dio ha messo nelle tue mani!'. Siamo seri: una cosa è dire ' Vi è un solo Dio per tutti'; altra cosa è dire che Egli si interessa a me, verme insignificante, fino a volermi 'divinizzare' in Gesù.... Questa è la rivelazione che mi ha chiamato!".
 Gesù, la libertà dell'uomo senza "sottomissione"
 Mohammed Christophe si sofferma poi sulle questioni dell'apostasia e sul seguire Cristo fino al rischio della morte:
"[Cristo domanda:] Sei pronto a seguirmi e a lasciare tutto per me? Quando si è ben compreso ciò che Gesù richiede per amore, si misurano tutte le difficoltà per rispondere a Lui in modo affermativo. E una cosa è dirgli 'sì' con le labbra; altra cosa è lasciare tutto per Lui. A noi che veniamo dall'islam ciò ha per conseguenza di rompere con il proprio passato, la propria famiglia e comunità, le proprie certezze morali o spirituali.
Lo so, è molto più semplice rimanere musulmani. Non prendendo alcuna posizione (Beh, in fondo abbiamo lo stesso Dio), le scuse sono numerose e facili per non operare questo abbandono, accettare questa trasformazione, morire a se stesso e seguire Gesù, [in] una conversione esigente che si compie solo con il suo aiuto. È il passo che il giovane ricco del Vangelo non ha voluto fare, perché almeno all'inizio, occorre il proprio libero consenso: Gesù non mi impone di 'sottomettermi'[islam], ma di amarlo in tutta libertà. Ed ecco ancora una grande differenza: Dio ci crea liberi o schiavi? A seconda della nostra risposta, Dio non diviene più lo stesso: in un caso io incorro nella punizione riservata agli apostati o agli empi; nell'altro io sono il figliol prodigo atteso dal padre, che chiama tutti i servitori non appena mi vede all'orizzonte. Lasciare l'islam è pericoloso, lo si fa a rischio della vita. E allora, cari fratelli e sorelle dell'occidente, accogliete e sostenete quelli che lo fanno....
Insisto: io non parlo del Dio dei musulmani, ma del Dio del Corano. I musulmani sono miei fratelli e forse domani saranno miei fratelli e sorelle in Cristo. E dagli anni '90 questa non è solo una speranza, ma una realtà che mi fa gioire e lodare il Signore: Alleluia! Gesù è venuto per salvare tutti gli uomini, anche i musulmani!".

Fonte: AsiaNews.it

Le Coran et le Paradis Mahometan

Voyons ce qu'en disait Saint Alphonse-Marie de Liguori, Docteur de L'Eglise du Christ:

Citation:
Du reste, pour connaitre l’impiété de cette loi, il suffit de savoir qu'elle permet à ses adeptes la vengeance, le vol, et les plaisirs charnels; bien plus, elle ne fait consister le paradis de la vie eternelle que dans les honteuses voluptés de la chair.
C'est donc une loi qui convient plutôt à des bêtes qu'à des hommes doués de raison.

http://foicatholique.cultureforum.net/t2091-coran-paradis-mahometan

Saint Alphonse de Liguori, docteur de l'Église, condamne l'Islam

"Pour ce qui est de la religion Mahométane, tout le monde sait qu'elle n'est autre chose qu'un mélange grotesque de judaïsme et d'hérésies, dont le propagateur fut un homme vil, impudique et voleur, je veux dire Mahomet, qui, avec le concours d'une infâme canaille de sa trempe, séduisit les peuples pour leur faire embrasser une foi et une loi mieux faites pour les bêtes que pour les hommes. Mahomet faisait sonner bien haut que sa religion lui avait été révélée de Dieu, comme il l'écrit lui-même dans son Coran; mais il suffit de lire ce Coran pour connaître que tout ce qu'il renferme est un tissu de fables, d'inepties et d'impiétés."

Source: Saint Alphonse et l'Islam, éd. Saint-Remi, p. 18, extrait du Traité Les Vérités de la Foi, Partie III, Chap. XI.

Comparons cela avec le décret de Vatican II Nostra Aetate, qui dit à propos des musulmans:

"L'Église regarde aussi avec estime les musulmans, qui adorent le Dieu unique, vivant et subsistant, miséricordieux et tout-puissant, créateur du ciel et de la terre, qui a parlé aux hommes. Ils cherchent à se soumettre de toute leur âme aux décrets de Dieu, même s'ils sont cachés, comme s'est soumis à Dieu Abraham, auquel la foi islamique se réfère volontiers."

Wikipedia: Alphonse de Liguori

List of Islamic Terror in Nigeria - starting with most recent (from January 2000 to December 30th, 2009)

December 30 2009, Bauchi, (Northern Nigeria) Radical Islamic sect Kala-Kato a branch of Maitasine attacked Christians and burned Churches; 70 people were killed.
July 26 2009 Maidugiri, Yobe, Bauchi, Kano, (Northern Nigeria) Radical Islamic fundamentalist sect, Boko Haram [translated “Western civilization is evil”] goes on rampage burning churches, and looting homes belonging to Christians and murdering them. Three Christian pastors including George Orji (Igbo) were killed by beheading. Officially 800 people were reported killed.
2007, Adamawa (Northern Nigeria) Moslem jihadists invade Christian community of Yugor killing hundreds of Christians, looting and burning churches and Christian’s homes and property.
2006 Maidugiri, (Northern Nigeria) Islamic fundamentalists protesting cartoon of Prophet Mohammed by Danish cartoonist killed hundreds of Christians, burned down scores of Churches, and looted shops and homes belonging to Christians.
2006 All over Northern Nigeria. Similar riots by Islamic jihadists were held in numerous towns in Northern Nigeria – Katsina, Bauchi, Minna, Potiskum, Kano, Kotangora. Thousands of Christians were killed, scores of churches were looted and burned and personal homes and businesses of Christians were looted and burned. One week before that Nigerian MP’s burned Danish and Norwegian flags in the parliament premises.
June 28 2006, Abuja (Northern Nigeria) The Federal government of Nigeria accused Kano State of Northern Nigeria of collaborating with foreign powers to train 100 Muslim militants in “intelligence gathering” and the "practice of jihad". In a news release, Information Minister Frank Nweke said the "Hisbah", a group employed by the mainly Muslim state of Kano to enforce sharia law, was "a parallel security outfit that poses a potential threat to national security".
April 2003, Kano (Northern Nigeria) Islamic jihadists go on a rampage A pastor, Sunday Madumere (Igbo) and six of his family members were killed.
April, 2003, Jos (Northern Nigeria) Armed Muslim insurgents attacked Wereng village near Vom a suburb of Jos killing people, burning homes and looting people’s property.
April, 2003, Langtang (Northern Nigeria) A group of armed Muslims attacked a village in Langtang killing people and burning down homes.
2003 Gusau (Northern Nigeria) Governor Ahmed Sani, who came to the United States and used the VOA to advertise the introduction of fundamentalist Islamic Sharia Law in Nigeria promising that it will never be applied to Christians gave an order that more than 20 of the Christian churches in the State be demolished. They were demolished promptly. No reasons were given.
March, 2003 Jos (Northern Nigeria) Thousands of jihad warriors attacked the town of Kardako in Wase Local Government Area (LGA) shouting “Allahu Akbar” killing Christians and burning down homes.
February, 2003 Ibadan (Western Nigeria) Muslims jihadists from the National Council of Muslim Youth Organizations attacked Christian schools in Ibadan in an effort to force the schools to require women to wear Islamic head coverings. Hundreds of students and teachers were injured in the attack.
December 26, 2002, Bauchi, (Northern Nigeria) Islamic jihadists attacked Christians concluding a Christmas celebration in Bauchi killing Christians, looting and burning churches and Christian’s homes.
December 2002, Jos, (Northern Nigeria). Muslim Jihadists attack Christians. During the attack Rev. Bitrus Manjang, his son, daughter-in- law and their six-month old child were shot to death outside their home. The jihadists went on killing people looting and burning churches and Christian’s homes.
November, 2002 Kano, Kaduna (Northern Nigeria) Muslim jihadists went on a rampage after an article in the This Day newspaper suggested that the prophet Muhammad would probably have married a contestant from the Miss World pageant scheduled to be held in Abuja. Muslim mobs ransacked the newspaper’s office, issued a fatwa on the author of the article, Miss Isioma, killed Christians and burned down numerous churches.
October 2002, Jos, (Northern Nigeria) Hundreds of Christians were killed when a mob of several Muslims jihadists attacked the town of Fajul in Plateau State. Mercenaries from Chad and Niger were believed to be among the group, which burned down homes, churches, and raped several women.
September 11, 2002, Jos, (Northern Nigeria) A bomb exploded at the Church of Christ in the Laranto suburb of Jos. No one was injured, but there was some structural damage to the church building.
August 2002 Kano, (Northern Nigeria) The government of Kano State ordered half of the churches in Kano State closed because of Muslim complaints about “too many churches.”
June 2002, Jos, (Northern Nigeria) Several Christian communities in Plateau state including Yelwa, Shendam, Wase, Barakin Ladi, Vom and Miango were invaded by Islamic jihadists who killed people and burned down homes and churches.
June, 2002, Minna, (Northern Nigeria) At least 75 Christians were arrested in Niger state for opposing the state’s Islamic sharia law.
April 8-22, 2002, Kano (Northern Nigeria) At least seven churches in Kano State were destroyed by authorities. There is a growing trend in states that have enacted Sharia law to destroy Christian churches on the pretense that the churches have violated building codes. Christians believe it is a step toward wiping out the Christian faith in northern Nigeria.
April 2002, Sokoto (Northern Nigeria) Two Christians in Zamfara State were tried on the charge of apostasy, converting from Islam to Christianity. According to Islamic law, the penalty for apostasy is death. However the two Christians, Lawali Yakubu and Ali Jafaru, claim they were never Muslims to start with. The two belong to an ethnic group that has practiced Christianity for many years.
February, 2002 Ilorin (Northern Nigeria) Muslims in Ilorin turned violent while celebrating Eid-el-Kabir and began attacking and killing Christians and burning their houses and businesses.
February 2002, Kano (Northern Nigeria) The Kano state government revealed that it had closed down 122 Christian schools for failing to meet state requirements. The requirement in question is the compulsory study of Islam. Christian schools have refused to allow Muslim clerics into their schools, thus risking closure.
February, 2002, Gombe, (Northern Nigeria) A Christian lady, Esther Bulus was kidnapped from her school by four Muslims who slit her throat and left her to die. Esther had refused to marry a Muslim politician in Gombe on grounds of religious differences. She was murdered because of this.
December 30, 2001, Jos, (Northern Nigeria) Armed Muslim jihadists attacked the Christian community in southern Jos, killing people, looting and destroying property worth several million dollars.
December 2001, Yola (Northern Nigeria) Muslim army soldiers from the 23rd Armored 7th Brigade in Yola, burned a Christian church building, which was constructed in the army barracks. They justified the act by saying it was an illegal structure. However, the army officially allows both Islam and Christianity to be practiced in the barracks.
December 10, 2001, Kano, (Northern Nigeria) Truck driver Uche Nwama was killed by Islamic jihadists for allowing the exhaust from his truck to drift into an open-air Islamic meeting. Islamic jihadists claimed the exhaust had desecrated the Quran.
November 6 2001; Ibadan (Western Nigeria) Islamic jihadists hold a massive rally in Ibadan in support of Osama Bin Laden and his attack and slaughter of thousands of Americans during the 9/11/2001 terrorist attack on the World Trade Center in New York. They condemn the United States for attacking the Taliban in Afghanistan and vow to fight alongside Bin Laden and his fellow terrorists.
November 2001 (Northern and Western Nigeria) Islamic jihadists hold massive rallies in Osogbo, Sokoto, Kano, Zaria, Kaduna, and other towns in Western and Northern Nigeria in support of Osama Bin Laden and his attack and slaughter of thousands of Americans during 9/11/2001 terrorist attack on the World Trade Center in New York. They condemn the United States for attacking the Taliban in Afghanistan. They also vow to fight alongside Bin Laden and his fellow terrorists in a jihad against America.
November 28, 2001 Enugu (Eastern Nigeria) Christian Biafrans organize a peaceful rally in Enugu in solidarity with and support of the government and people of the United States over the terrorist attack in New York on 9/11/2001 and in support of the United States action against the terrorists. The Nigerian paramilitary police brutalized the participants, disbanded the rally and arrested the leaders.
October 14-18, 2001 Kano (Northern Nigeria) Massive anti-American protests in Kano by Islamic jihadists. Thousands of Christians are slaughtered and scores of churches are burned. Property of Christians worth billions of dollars are looted and destroyed.
October 2001, Kaduna (Northern Nigeria) Islamic jihadists attack Christians in churches, on the street and in their homes. Thousands of Christians are slaughtered, scores of churches are burned and looted, and thousands of Christian homes are looted, and burned.
September 2001, Kano (Northern Nigeria) Islamic jihadists attack Christians burning down churches slaughtering thousands of people, looting churches and private homes. Kano State government demolishes the few remaining churches.
September 2001, Jos (Northern Nigeria) In a well planned and highly coordinated program Islamic jihadists attack Christians in the city of Jos, burning down churches, and private homes of Christians, looting the churches and private property of Christians. Hundreds of churches were burned and thousands of Christians were slaughtered some burned while worshipping in their churches.
August 2001, Bauchi, (Northern Nigeria). The Bauchi state government is alleged to be using Muslim mercenaries to attack Christians in the Tafawa Balewa and Bogora districts. On several occasions vehicles loaded with Islamic jihadists were intercepted by vigilant Christians. Several hundred Christians were killed and houses, shops and churches looted, burned and destroyed.
June 2001, Gawaram (Northern Nigeria) Islamic jihadists attack Christians, burn down dozens of churches and kill Christians.
February 24-25, 2001, (Gombe) A visit to Gombe state by an Israeli ambassador sparked a riot by Islamic jihadists. During the riot the jihadists kill Christians, loot and burn down churches, loot and burn down Christian homes and render thousands of people homeless. The Calvary Baptist Church and the Bishara Baptist church are among those looted and burned.
September 2000 Gombe (Northern Nigeria) In Bambam, Gombe state Islamic jihadists attack and kill Christians, burn down and loot churches and private homes and businesses of Christians.
May 2000, Kaduna (Northern Nigeria) For several days Islamic jihadists attack and slaughter hundreds of people in Kaduna.. They loot thousands of Christian people’s homes, churches, businesses and then burn them down. Thousands of Christians are mindlessly slaughtered and more than 200 churches are burned.
February 2000, Kaduna (Northern Nigeria) Islamic jihadists attack and slaughter Christians opposing the implementation of Sharia law in Kaduna, northern Nigeria. Christian homes, businesses and churches are looted, and burned. Thousands of Christians are mercilessly slaughtered and property worth billions of dollars are looted and destroyed by the jihadists.
2000 Damboa, Maidugiri, (Northern Nigeria) Islamic jihadists attack and slaughter Christians, loot and burn Christian homes, businesses and churches.

Source Facebook

Dialogue islamo-chrétien ?

Christianisme et mahometisme, cohabitation impossible

Voir aussi:
Mogadiscio et Somalie

Mariages islamo-chrétiens

Santiago Matamoros - the Moor (Muslim) slayer

The finding of the sacred remains of St. James, the Son of Thunder, by Bishop Teodomirus signalled the general call to war against the Moorish (Islamic) invaders, who had by then the control of the greatest part of the Peninsula, the Northwest excepted, and had even entered into France, menacing the rest of Christendom. A small militia under King Don Pelayo had already repelled the invaders at the battle of Covadonga, in 718, starting the Reconquista of Spain.

It was at Clavijo, in 845, that the forces of King Ramiro I defeated the far superior army of Abderraman II. The galvanizing cry of the Christian soldiers was ¡Santiago y cierra España!, "For St. James, and close ranks, Spain!" The General Chronicle of King Alfonso X the Wise reports a miraculous event during the battle of Clavijo, which gave the cult of St. James a dramatic configuration. According to witnesses, Santiago was seen descending from the sky mounted on a white horse, having in one hand a snow-white banner on which was displayed a blood red cross, and in the other a sword, en un cavallo blanco con una senya blanca et grand espada reluzient en la mano. We may interpret this intervention of St. James as a precise fact or as a poetic licence; what matters is the undeniable fact of the miraculous protection of the Son of Thunder, who will become from this time on the Patron of Spain. The imagery will present him thereafter as a knight on a white horse, carrying a banner with the Cross of Santiago and wielding a flashing sword. Protector of Christendom, he became Santiago Matamoros, the Moor slayer. And the Mozarabic Office salutes him from then on as Defensor Almae Hispaniae, Jacobe, vindex hostium, "James, defender of the soul of Spain, punisher of its enemies."

If Islam was able to subjugate the Visigothic monarchy with the help of the Prophet Mohammed, the small Christian troops will counterattack with the assistance of St. James. As Américo Castro put it, Cruzadas versus Alcoranadas, or the Cross against the Koran.

The vocation of the Son of Thunder for combat against the infidels manifested itself in countless occasions during the Reconquista and every war in defence of Holy Religion, up to our days. Caudillo de Cruzados, "commander of crusaders," he was invoked by the soldiers fighting the Reds during the Spanish civil war (1936-1939) and especially during the decisive battle of the river Ebro. Generalissimo Francisco Franco went as far as stating: "If one wants to get rid of Spain, take away Santiago."

Santiago Matamoros, in the words of Félix Sardá y Salvany, the great Catalan anti-Liberal apologist, "is the most perfect and adequate representation of the faith of our people; the faith of Spain is indeed a militant faith; this is what has characterized us always an even nowadays; this is what makes incomprehensible to foreigners the major part of our history’s pages, as well as the attitudes and events of today’s Spain. One must understand that we are and want to remain heirs and disciples of an armed apostle and of a Santiago fighting bloody battles on horseback: this is the key to decipher the enigma of our apparently strange national character."

Indeed, the Catholic history of Spain is founded upon the blood of countless martyrs, from the early disciples of Santiago until those who in the tragic and glorious epopee of 1936-1939 died with a smile, forgiving their assassins and crying ¡Viva Cristo Rey!

The restoration of Christendom requires, today as ever, a militant approach to every facet of life, and Santiago is perhaps our best model. Una manu sua faciebat opus et altera tenebat gladium. Work and combat, under Mary’s protection; we should make ours these two lessons of Santiago: constant work and militant attitude in order to defend the principles of Catholic civilization.

See: Rorate Caeli - Blog

See also:

• James, Son of Zebedee

Santo subito! Per chi? Per i cattolici o per i maomettani?

Grandezze” (islamiche) di Giovanni Paolo II

Pubblichiamo in calce a questa brevissima nota introduttiva due perle dell’indimenticabile (e come potremmo mai dimenticarcene?) Giovanni Paolo II, del quale è stato scritto, da una penna assolutamente insospettabile di simpatie tradizionaliste come quella di Ida Magli su l’Indipendente, che “mai un Papa ha fatto tanto male alla Chiesa”.

E, in effetti… il 5 maggio 2001, ricorrenza napoleonica, G.P. II atterrava a Damasco, per venerare la tomba del Battista nella locale moschea e incontrare il Presidente siriano Bashar-al-Assad, le cui mani grondano del sangue dei cristiani libanesi; sorvoliamo sul fatto che l’insigne reliquia della testa di San Giovanni Battista è custodita a Roma, nella chiesa di San Silvestro.

Il giorno dopo, il 6 maggio, parlando ai càpataz mediorientali della locale comunità islamica, Woytjla le spara subito grosse. Uniamo queste dichiarazioni del 2001 a quelle, ancora più clamorose, che G.P. II aveva pronunciato il 9 maggio 1985, ai partecipanti al colloquio sul tema «La santità nel Cristianesimo e nell'Islam», tenutosi nell’ex città eterna e, ancor più, ex città santa della Cristianità. Pubblichiamo entrambe le dichiarazioni woytjliane in fondo a queste nostre osservazioni.

Si sa che il Dio dei cristiani è Sancta Trinitas, unus Deus e dunque Padre, Figlio e Spirito Santo; è parimenti noto che i musulmani non riconoscono come Dio né lo Spirito Santo, né il Figlio cioè Gesù Cristo e dunque che essi non abbiano per Dio neppure il Padre, giacché, come dice il Vangelo, “chiunque nega il Figlio, non possiede nemmeno il Padre e chi professa la sua fede nel Figlio possiede anche il Padre” (Gv. 2, 23). Se ne deduce che cristiani cattolici da un lato e musulmani dall’altro non hanno in comune lo stesso Dio, puramente e semplicemente non hanno in comune Dio. Sicché, si deve dirlo chiaramente, la setta maomettana adora un demone, secondo l’assunto del Salmo 95, 5 che recita testualmente: “Omnes dii gentium, daemonia” e cioè che, al di fuori del vero Dio e della vera religione, “tutti gli dei delle genti sono demoni”.

Che dice invece l’impagabile Woytjla nel 2001 e nel 1985? Egli dichiara che, nei loro luoghi di preghiera, cristiani e maomettani “incontrano il Dio misericordioso” (quale Dio?); che debbono portare rispetto per le preghiere (vere o false, dirette a Dio o al diavolo non importa) gli uni degli altri; riconosce che c’è una santità anche nell’Islam e, dunque, che la santità autentica non è unicamente quella cattolica, dunque che ci si può santificare anche in una religione falsa e demoniaca come quella musulmana; che il Dio trinitario dei cattolici e il dio degl’islamici è lo stesso (“Come spesso ho detto in altri incontri con i musulmani, il vostro Dio e il nostro è uno solo e lo stesso”, così nel 1985); che il Corano è un libro sacro (“il vostro sacro Corano”, afferma testualmente); che esso chiama alla rettitudine, alla bontà e alla virtù. Come le cronache riferiscono allorché ci parlano ogni giorno di uccisioni di miscredenti, attentati, barbarie, poligamia, schiavitù ecc. all’ombra e sotto l’egida della mezzaluna e col permesso, anzi con l’esplicito incitamento da parte delle varie sure craniche.

Una simile professione di relativismo religioso e d’indifferentismo, che postula tutte le religioni essere uguali o comunque ordinate alla salvezza, contrariamente agli assunti del tradizionale e perenne Magistero cattolico, rende ragione del perché il mondo anticristiano abbia acclamato Giovanni Paolo II (non solo da morto) ma già quand’era in vita, come i sodomiti spagnoli hanno fatto provocatoriamente con Zapatero, Santo subito!

Santo subito? “Ma mi faccia il piacere!”, direbbe Totò.

Giovanni Paolo II bacia il Corano, il “libro sacro” dei maomettani. Il fatto rimonta al 14 maggio 1999, quando Wojtila riceve una delegazione di capi religiosi cristiani e musulmani dall’Iraq.

Source: Traditio.it

Les croisades

Partis répandre la foi de Mahomet, les Arabes s'emparent de Jérusalem en 638. Réduits à la condition de dhimmi, les chrétiens du Moyen-Orient sont autorisés à pratiquer leur religion, mais astreints au port de signes distinctifs et au paiement d'un impôt spécial. Construire de nouvelles églises leur est interdit, ce qui, à terme, les condamne. Les pèlerinages européens peuvent continuer (pour les chrétiens du Moyen Age, le pèlerinage est une dévotion essentielle), mais à condition de payer un tribut. En 800, les califes abbassides, qui ont Bagdad pour capitale, reconnaissent à Charlemagne la tutelle morale sur les Lieux saints. Toutefois, au début du XIe siècle, la situation s'aggrave. Pour conserver leur poste, les chrétiens employés par le califat doivent se convertir à l'islam. En 1009, le calife El-Hakim persécute les non-musulmans. En 1078, les Turcs seldjoukides prennent Jérusalem. Dès lors, les pèlerinages deviennent si dangereux qu'ils finissent par s'interrompre.

Au VIIe siècle, les musulmans ont conquis la Palestine et la Syrie ; au VIIIe siècle, ils ont envahi l'Afrique du Nord en y détruisant une chrétienté dont saint Augustin avait jadis été la gloire, puis ils ont occupé l'Espagne et le Portugal ; au IXe siècle, ils ont conquis la Sicile. En ce XIe siècle, Constantinople fait face au péril turc. En 1054, un schisme a séparé l'Eglise d'Orient de l'Eglise de Rome, mais les différends théologiques n'empêchent pas les deux pôles du monde chrétien de se parler. Contre la pression turque, en 1073, l'empereur byzantin Michel VII appelle au secours le pape Grégoire VII, demande renouvelée par Alexis Ier Comnène à l'adresse d'Urbain II en 1095. En Espagne, la Reconquête chrétienne a commencé dès 1030. Tolède a été repris aux Maures en 1085 mais, l'année suivante, les Almoravides, venus du Maroc, ont lancé une nouvelle offensive. A l'incitation du pape, des chevaliers français se sont engagés dans les armées d'Aragon, de Castille et du Portugal. En Sicile, les Normands ont débarqué en 1040, ont chassé les Arabes au terme d'une guerre de trente ans.

C'est dans cette perspective à la fois géopolitique et culturelle qu'il faut replacer l'appel lancé par le pape, à Clermont, en 1095. La croisade, répétons-le, forme une réplique à l'expansion de l'islam, une riposte à l'implantation des Arabes et des Turcs en des régions qui ont été le berceau du christianisme au temps de saint Paul, implantation musulmane qui ne n'est d'ailleurs pas opérée par la douceur mais par de très classiques moyens militaires, c'est-à-dire par la force. Délivrer les Lieux saints, permettre aux chrétiens de se rendre sur les lieux où le Christ a vécu et où ses fidèles sont désormais persécutés, c'est le but de la croisade.

Les croisades devraient être comprises comme le moyen le plus sûr de vaincre la religion du "faux prophète" et de cesser son expansion. Et ce jusqu'au XVIIIème siècle. Châteaubriand affirmait dans ses Mémoires d'outre-tombe : "... Les croisades ne furent des folies, comme on affectait de les appeler, ni dans leur principe, ni dans leur résultat. (...) Les croisades, en affaiblissant les hordes mahométanes au centre même de l'Asie, nous ont empêchés de devenir la proie des Turcs et des Arabes..."

Source: http://www.christ-roi.net/index.php/Les_croisades

Le mythe de la tolérance islamique

Voir et lire attentivement: http://www.christ-roi.net/index.php/Le_mythe_de_la_tol%C3%A9rance_islamique

St. Thomas Aquinas' Teaching Against the Infidel Mohammed

"He (Mohammed) seduced the people by promises of carnal pleasure to which the concupiscence of the flesh urges us. His teaching also contained precepts that were in conformity with his promises, and he gave free rein to carnal pleasure. In all this, as is not unexpected; he was obeyed by carnal men. As for proofs of the truth of his doctrine, he brought forward only such as could be grasped by the natural ability of anyone with a very modest wisdom. Indeed, the truths that he taught he mingled with many fables and with doctrines of the greatest falsity.

He did not bring forth any signs produced in a supernatural way, which alone fittingly gives witness to divine inspiration; for a visible action that can be only divine reveals an invisibly inspired teacher of truth. On the Contrary, Mohammed said that he was sent in the power of his arms - which are signs not lacking even to robbers and tyrants. What is more, no wise men, men trained in things divine and human, believed in him from the beginning (1). Those who believed in him were brutal men and desert wanderers, utterly ignorant of all divine teaching, through whose numbers Mohammed forced others to become his follower's by the violence of his arms. Nor do divine pronouncements on part of preceding prophets offer him any witness. On the contrary, he perverts almost all the testimony of the Old and the New Testaments by making them into a fabrication of his own, as can be seen by anyone who examines his law. It was, therefore, a shrewd decision on his part to forbid his followers to read the Old and New Testaments, lest these books convict him of falsity. It is thus clear that those who place faith in his words believe foolishly." - Summa Contra Gentiles, Book 1, Chapter 16, Art. 4. Footnote: 1. Sura 21:5, Sura 44:14; Sura 16:103, Sura 37:36

Source: http://www.opusdeialert.com/st-thomas-aquinas-against-mohammed.htm

L'ecumenismo uccide la carità: maomettani confermati nell'errore

di Elsa Franscini. - Quando si dice “perseverare è diabolico”. Per il terzo anno l'oratorio di Arnate, frazione di Gallarate (Va) viene messo a disposizione dei maomettani per il loro ramadan. Si tratta di un periodo di astinenza per modo di dire: per un mese gli islamici potranno mangiare, bere, divertirsi e fare sesso ma solo di notte. Di giorno dovranno dedicarsi anche alla preghiera e il parroco di Arnate, don Adriano Colombo, col placet del prevosto di Gallarate, mons. Franco Carnevali, si è prodigato, come già avviene da due anni, per ospitare i maomettani.

DEBOLEZZA. Gli eterni nemici della Cristianità, nonchè negatori della divinità di Cristo, avranno modo una volta di più di disprezzare questa debolezza che per loro è soltanto il frutto della “poca fede dei cristiani” nel loro credo. Così, in nome del falso ecumenismo che uccide la carità, verranno confermati nel loro errore, cioè incancreniti nel rifiuto di riconoscere la divinità di Colui che ha detto: "Io sono la via, la verità e la vita: non si va al Padre se non tramite me". E ai suoi: "Andate, battezzate e insegnate il Vangelo: chi crederà e sarà battezzato sarà salvo, ma chi non crederà sarà condannato" (Marco 16,16). Le autorità locali, dal canto loro, vedranno vanificata la loro azione politica che, nel 2005, portò alla chiusura di uno stabile adibito a moschea.

PREOCCUPAZIONE. Quanto alla brava gente, in tanti si dicono scandalizzati e turbati da queste scelte fuorvianti, che finiscono con il porre sullo stesso piano la religione di Dio e quelle degli uomini, a cui si aggiunge poi una certa preoccupazione: “Tireremo un respiro di sollievo solo tra un mese, quando tutto ciò sarà finito”, spiega un professionista della zona. E qualcuno ricorda come si espresse il compianto vescovo di Como, mons. Alessandro Maggiolini, a proposito di quei padri somaschi che concessero ai maomettani la palestra del loro istituto scolastico per pregare: “Sono stati dei tonti – disse Maggiolini -. E coi reprobi si può anche discutere, ma coi tonti proprio no”.

http://www.ecclesiacatholica.it/ - 11 agosto 2010
Last Updated ( Saturday, 14 August 2010 17:44 )

La Cei dà i numeri: bruciare il Corano è da veri cristiani!

di Paola Galli. - Nella sceneggiata del Corano da bruciare ci mancava solo la Conferenza episcopale italiana a recitare la parte più comica: una difesa del Corano, che un predicatore Usa in cerca di pubblicità, tale Terry Jones, aveva promesso di bruciare simbolicamente. Quasi un atto dovuto per un cristiano (anche se Jones è una sorta di protestante) visto che il libro scritto da Maometto è una collezione di bestemmie contro la divinità di Cristo, spacciato per semplice profeta e persino impostore (ha mandato a morire in croce uno che gli somigliava!) e per la Madonna (non è affatto la Madre di Dio!). Assurdità a cui si aggiunge l'odio puro, con le prescrizione di uccidere i cristiani “appena possibile”.

ATTO SACRILEGO. Nefandezze che dovrebbero condannare questo libro, se non al rogo come usava in tempi più cattolici nella Chiesa (anch'essa più) cattolica, almeno al sequestro per i reati di istigazione all'odio religioso e al delitto che esso diffonde. Invece a difendere il Corano giungono zelanti coloro che dovrebbero difendere Cristo e la Cristianità. “Bruciare un libro è sempre un atto sacrilego. Non dobbiamo dimenticare che la prima cosa che fecero i nazisti, con la Notte dei cristalli, fu quella di bruciare i Talmud (che peraltro contengono anch'essi terribili offese a Gesù e alla Vergine, ndr), i libri dell'ebraismo”: questo lo sdegnato commento di monsignor Ambrogio Spreafico, presidente della commissione Cei per l'evangelizzazione dei popoli e il dialogo fra le Chiese nonchè vescovo di Frosinone.

PREOCCUPAZIONE FONDATA. L'unica cosa seria detta da mons. Spreafico è che il gesto esibizionistico di Jones “mette in pericolo la vita di centinaia di milioni di cristiani in tutto il mondo. Penso alle comunità cristiane dell'Iraq, del Pakistan o dell'Indonesia”. Questa preoccupazione fondata, non dovrebbe tuttavia indurre un vescovo cattolico a considerare un “sacrilegio” il rogo di un libro che offende quando di più sacro c'è nella religione di Dio. Ad uso della Cei e dei nostri lettori, ci permettiamo di riportare alcune delle, tante, amenità che si possono leggere nel Corano, prendendo spunto dall'edizione “moderata”, quella in versione italiana e diffusa nelle moschee d'Italia.

ECCO IL CORANO. “Combattete coloro che non credono in Allah e nell'Ultimo Giorno, che non vietano quello che Allah e il Suo Messaggero hanno vietato, e quelli, tra la gente della Scrittura, che non scelgono la religione della verità, finché non versino umilmente il tributo, e siano soggiogati” (IX, 29). “E quando il tuo Signore ispirò agli angeli: "Invero sono con voi: rafforzate coloro che credono. Getterò il terrore nei cuori dei miscredenti: colpiteli tra il capo e collo, colpiteli su tutte le falangi! E ciò avvenne perché si erano separati da Allah e dal Suo Messaggero. Non siete certo voi che li avete uccisi: è Allah che li ha uccisi” (VIII, 12-17). “Quando incontrate i miscredenti, colpiteli al collo finché li abbiate soggiogati, poi legateli strettamente” (LXVII,4). “Quando poi sono trascorsi i mesi sacri, uccidete questi associatori (chi crede nella Santissima Trinità, ndr) ovunque li incontriate, catturateli, assediateli e tendete loro agguati. Se poi si pentono, eseguono l'orazione e pagano la decima, lasciateli andare per la loro strada. Allah è perdonatore, misericordioso” (IX, 5). “La ricompensa di coloro che fanno la guerra ad Allah e al Suo Messaggero e che seminano la corruzione sulla terra è che siano uccisi o crocifissi, che siano loro tagliate la mano e la gamba da lati opposti o che siano esiliati sulla terra: ecco l'ignominia che li toccherà in questa vita; nell'altra vita avranno castigo immenso” (V, 33). “Uccideteli ovunque li incontriate, e scacciateli da dove vi hanno scacciati: la persecuzione è peggiore dell'omicidio. Ma non attacateli vicino alla Santa Moschea, fino a che essi non vi abbiano aggredito. Se vi assalgono, uccideteli. Questa è la ricompensa dei miscredenti” (II, 191).

Nell'immagine: San Domenico ordina un rogo di libri eretici.

http://www.ecclesiacatholica.it/ - 10 settembre 2010
Last Updated ( Friday, 10 September 2010 22:16 )

Islamici e filo americani: in Pachistan stuprate e uccise le bambine cristiane

L'Agenzia vaticana Fides spezza il vergognoso silenzio internazionale sull'orrore quotidiano della repubblica coranica, e filo americana, del Pakistan: altre due bambine appartenenti alla piccola e perseguitata comunità cristiana sono state bestialmente seviziate da un branco di maomettani, una è morta. Mentre gli Usa intervengono per chiedere alla Svizzera di annullare l'esito del referendum popolare che proibisce la costruzione di nuovi minareti, in Pakistan la barbarie mussulmana continua incontrastata.

PERSECUZIONE PERMESSA. Ai pakistani, alleati degli Stati Uniti contro i talebani, viene permesso di perseguitare tranquillamente la minoranza cristiana: nel paese dove i cristiani sono cittadini di serie C rispetto ai mussulmani, al 2009 sono state rapite 1.198 ragazze, 1.052 uccise. Gli ultimi episodi a Rawalpindi e Faisalabad. Nella prima località una bambina di 12 anni, Lubna Masih, è stata sequestrata da 5 maomettani. Era nel negozio sotto casa a prendere il latte: l'hanno caricata a forza su un'auto sotto gli occhi dei passanti. La piccola chiedeva aiuto disperatamente, nessuno è intervenuto.

INDEMONIATI. Trasportata nei pressi di un cimitero di periferia, la 12enne è stata violentata per ore da un branco di mussulmani indemoniati, finchè è morta. Il suo corpicino è stato gettato su un cumulo di rifiuti. Il medesimo orrore è toccato a Kiran Nayyaz, tredicenne di Faisalabad: la credevano morta, invece si è salvata. E' rimasta incinta e la Chiesa cattolica locale la sta aiutando come può.

NESSUNA GIUSTIZIA. Le famiglie delle vittime vivono nel terrore e non possono sperare di avere giustizia: tutti questi episodi rimangono impuniti e i cristiani che osano denunciare dei mussulmani finiscono regolarmente in prigione per calunnia: davanti al magistrato la parola di un maomettano ha, per legge, più valore di quella del cristiano, anche se si tratta della vittima e del carnefice.

http://www.ecclesiacatholica.it/ - 14 ottobre 2010
Last Updated ( Sunday, 17 October 2010 14:39 )

Tettamanzi, islam e libertà religiosa

Basterebbe essere degli autentici cattolici per sentire il dovere di opporsi alle nuove moschee invocate come una necessità spirituale dall’ineffabile Dionigi Tettamanzi, arcivescovo di Milano. Tra i grandi meriti della Chiesa cattolica, infatti, v’è quello di aver difeso per 1500 anni le anime e i corpi del gregge di Cristo dai lupi di Maometto. Sin dagli albori della sua espansione, l’islam si è rivelato il nemico mortale della Cristianità. Ne ha fatto le spese tutta l’Africa del Nord, Terrasanta compresa, che era cristiana e venne sottomessa dai feroci invasori; ne subirono il tallone e la furia intere nazioni d’Europa, dalla Spagna alla Sicilia, e tutte le città adriatiche e mediterranee, soggette ad assalti, devastazioni, massacri e deportazioni in massa. Persino la basilica di san Pietro venne attaccata e depredata (era l’aprile 846) da un’incursione di arabi mussulmani. Nella loro sete di conquista, i maomettani giunsero sino a stringere d’assedio Vienna.

BALUARDO DELLA CRISTIANITA’. In tutte queste, e molte altre, circostanze la Chiesa cattolica si erse a baluardo della Cristianità, organizzando Sante Crociate, Leghe Sante e Riconquiste. Ci furono anche Pontefici, come l’ingiustamente vilipeso e dimenticato Giovanni X, sanguigno Papa romagnolo, che brandirono la spada e marciarono alla testa delle milizie cristiane per debellare le teste di ponte allestite dagli islamici nella Penisola. Altri infervorarono e benedirono le truppe, implorando e ottenendo dal Cielo vittorie miracolose, come san Pio V per la battaglia di Lepanto: nessun Papa, nessun vescovo, nessun santo, nessun prete rinunciò alla legittima difesa della Chiesa e delle anime.

CONVERTIRE IL SULTANO. Neppure san Francesco, suo malgrado diventato il simbolo di certo ecumenismo senza Verità, fece o disse mai qualcosa che in qualche modo possa giustificare l’attitudine collaborazionista di Tettamanzi sull’islam. Francesco partecipò alla quinta Crociata con il proposito di convertire il sultano d’Egitto Malik al Kamil, come risulta nella biografia del santo scritta da san Bonaventura ove si riporta la testimonianza di frate Illuminato, presente all’incontro. Il sultano tentò di mettere in difficoltà Francesco, lamentando l’attacco dei crociati: “Il vostro Dio ha insegnato nei suoi Vangeli che non si deve rendere male per male... Quanto più dunque i cristiani non devono invadere la nostra terra?”. Francesco replicò saldamente e senza complessi di colpa: “Non sembra che abbiate letto per intero il Vangelo di Cristo nostro Signore. Altrove dice infatti: se un tuo occhio ti scandalizza, cavalo e gettalo lontano da te... Con il che ci volle insegnare che dobbiamo sradicare completamente... un uomo per quanto caro o vicino, anche se ci fosse caro come un occhio della testa, che cerchi di toglierci dalla fede e dall’amore del nostro Dio. Per questo – concluse Francesco - i cristiani giustamente attaccano voi e la terra che avete occupato, perché bestemmiate il nome di Cristo e allontanate dal suo culto quelli che potete. Se pero voleste conoscere il creatore e redentore, confessarlo e adorarlo, vi amerebbero come loro stessi”. Parole sante, praticamente un sunto della dottrina cattolica nei confronti dell’islam; allo stesso modo la sacrosanta premura della Chiesa è sempre stata quella di privilegiare il bene delle anime e della comunità rispetto ai pretesi “diritti civili”.

FEDE SMARRITA. Il cardinale Tettamanzi, invece, si fa promotore di una propagazione dell’islam sotto la Madonnina, e proprio mentre si scopre che alcuni seguaci di Maometto stavano preparando una strage nel Duomo e attentati a caserme e obiettivi civili. Per questo la Lega lo ha attaccato con toni fortissimi, parlando anche di Chiesa che smarrisce la fede. A nostro avviso, pur essendo evidenti gli errori di certi ecclesiastici (almeno rispetto a quanto insegnato per duemila anni dalla sacra Istituzione fondata da Cristo), il vero problema è che tanto la Chiesa (pur con encomiabili eccezioni) quanto la politica sono afflitte da certi “malanni di stagione”. Il nodo cruciale di questo tempo prende il nome di libertà religiosa. Anche nel Carroccio si fatica a trovare qualcuno che consideri necessario ripensare l’intoccabile principio. Ma in tal caso diventa arduo sostenere che la libertà di religione, quindi anche di costruire luoghi di culto, valga per tutti (satanisti compresi) tranne che per gli islamici.

ORTODOSSIA CATTOLICA. Dal punto di vista dottrinale, l’affermazione del principio della libertà religiosa è piuttosto recente. Lo ha sancito per la prima volta il Concilio Vaticano II, producendo non poco scandalo e rimostranze tra i cattolici maggiormente consapevoli. Lo stesso cardinale Alfredo Ottaviani, all’epoca prefetto del Sant’Uffizio e dunque tutore dell’ortodossia cattolica, si oppose fermamente (sebbene senza successo) a questo inaudito cambiamento, bollandolo come una specie di eresia. Le motivazioni del rifiuto sono evidenti anche all’occhio del profano: ciò di cui vi è libertà, risulta intrinsecamente legittimo; invece davanti a Dio non vi sarebbe legittimità alcuna, bensì grave colpa, nel professare il rifiuto della Parola divina: “Chi crede nel Vangelo e sarà battezzato si salverà, chi non crede e non sarà battezzato sarà condannato”, ammonì Cristo. Tuttavia, non avrebbe alcun merito una fede imposta. Così, ricordava il cardinale Ottaviani, la Chiesa, per Duemila anni, ha sempre parlato di “tolleranza religiosa”, ma mai di “libertà religiosa”. A differenza della libertà, che è oggettiva, la tolleranza può essere relativa, consentendo anche opportune e motivate restrizioni della stessa libertà. Allora, affermato questo principio, avrebbe un senso anche porre l’alt alla costruzione di moschee, perché la tolleranza viene sempre meno di fronte al pericolo.

http://www.ecclesiacatholica.it/ - written by Julio Ferrari - Last Updated ( Friday, 23 January 2009 11:51 )

The Quran and the Holy Trinity - Islam’s Mistaken Views of Basic Christian Doctrines

By Sam Shamoun

Introduction

As the readers may already know, a cursory reading of the Islamic scripture shows that the author of the Quran distorted or was grossly mistaken about the beliefs of Jews and Christians. For example, the author accuses Christians of holding certain theological and christological beliefs that do not correspond to the facts. The Quran erroneously assumes and condemns Christians for believing in three gods consisting of the Father, Mary his wife, and Jesus their offspring. Thus, the Quran erroneously assumes that the implication of Christian beliefs is that God acquired a son through procreation, that God and Mary had sexual relations in order to have Jesus their Son (God forbid such horrendous blasphemy!).

These distortions of biblical teaching and historic Christian beliefs are well known and often commented on by Christian writers, evangelists, apologists, polemicists, scholars etc. They are even admitted by secular writers and sources.

One such writer was the late Christian scholar and Islamicist E.M. Wherry, who commented on the Quran’s distortion of the doctrine of the Holy Trinity in his A Comprehensive Commentary of the Quran. In reference to Sura 4:169[171] Wherry wrote:

Say not... three, "Namely, God, Jesus, Mary. For the Eastern writers mention a sect of Christians which held the Trinity to be composed of those three; but it is allowed that this heresy has been long since extinct (Elmacin, p. 227). The passage, however, is equally levelled against the Holy Trinity, according to the doctrine of the orthodox Christians, who, as Al Baidhawi acknowledges, believe the divine nature to consist of three persons, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost; by the Father, understanding God's essence; by the Son, his knowledge; and by the Holy Ghost, his life." - Sale.

See also Prelim. Disc., p. 64.

The commentators Baidhawi, Jalaluddin, and Yahya agree in interpreting the three to mean "God, Jesus, and Mary," in the relation of Father, Mother, and Son. This misrepresentation of the Scripture doctrine again stamps the Qur'an as a fabrication, and furnishes the evidence of its being such on the ground of its own claims. The history of the Church, as well as the Bible, proves the statement of the text, as interpreted by authoritative commentators, to be false; for even granting that some obscure Christian sect did hold such a doctrine of the Trinity (of which statement we have yet to learn the truth), yet the spirit of Muhammad's inspiration represents it as the faith of the Christians generally. In almost every case where the Qur'an refers to the Christian faith, it is to inveigh against the idea that God has a son. See chap. ix. 31, xix. 31, xliii. 59. (Source)

Christian author and apologist Dr. Robert A. Morey noted that:

The Quran contains many errors about what Christians believe and practice.

One of the most significant is that the Quran misrepresents the Christian doctrine of the Trinity.

Muhammad mistakenly thought that Christians worshiped three gods: the Father, the Mother (Mary), and the Son (Jesus), (Sura 5:73-75,116).

As Richard Bell pointed out:

[Muhammad] never understood the doctrine of the Trinity.

Encyclopedia Britannica states:

[There are] mistaken concepts of the Trinity in the Quran.

… In reality, Christians believe only in one God who is in three persons: the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. They do not believe that Mary is a part of the Trinity.

Even the Concise Dictionary of Islam admits:

In some cases the "material" which forms the substance of Quranic narrative, details of the creeds of Christianity and Judaism for example, does not correspond to those religion’s own understanding of their beliefs. This could be said, for example, of the notion of the Trinity found in the Quran, the story of Satan’s refusal to bow down to Adam, the Docetist view of the crucifixion, all of which can be traced to the dogmas of Gnostic sects, which are heretical in relationship to orthodox Christianity and Judaism. The Trinity "seen" in the Quran is not the Trinity of the Apostles Creed, or of the Nicene Creed. (Morey, The Islamic Invasion: Confronting the World’s Fastest Growing Religion [Harvest House Publishers, Eugene, Oregon 1992], pp. 152-153)

Noted Protestant Church historian and Patristic expert Philip Schaff wrote regarding Muhammad’s mistaken views:

In rude misconception or wilful perversion, Mohammed seems to have understood the Christian doctrine of the trinity to be a trinity of Father, Mary, and Jesus. The Holy Spirit is identified with Gabriel. "God is only one God! Far be it from his glory that he should have a son!" Sura 4, ver. 169; comp. 5, ver. 77. The designation and worship of Mary as "the mother of God" may have occasioned this strange mistake. There was in Arabia in the fourth century a sect of fanatical women called Collyridians (Kollurivde"), who rendered divine worship to Mary. Epiphanius, Haer. 79. (Schaff, History of the Christian Church, Volume IV, Chapter III, "Mohammedanism in its Relation to Christianity", fn. 188; source)

Another Christian Islamicist named Richard Bell stated:

On the other hand, there are considerable differences between the Qur’an and the New Testament. It should be noted, however, that so far as the actual statements of the Qur’an are concerned, the differences are not so great as they are sometimes supposed to be. Modern scholars, Christian and Muslim, tend to read later controversies into the wording of the Qur’an. Thus the rejection of the doctrine that 'God is one of three' [5.73/7] is usually taken to be a denial of the Christian doctrine of the Trinity; yet strictly speaking what is rejected is a doctrine of tritheism which orthodox Christianity also rejects. Similarly the rejection of the fatherhood of God the Father and the sonship of God the Son is strictly speaking a rejection of fatherhood and sonship in a physical sense; and this Christianity would also reject. The Virgin Birth is taught [19.16-33/4], but is interpreted simply as a miracle. The denial that Jesus died on the cross [4.157/6-159/7] is primarily a denial that the crucifixion was a Jewish victory; but, in line with the absence of the conception of sacrifice, it means that the Qur’an never speaks of the atonement or saving work of Jesus. (Bell’s Introduction to the Quran, revised by Montgomery Watt, Chapter 9, "The Doctrines of the Qur’an"; source; underline emphasis ours)

Source: Answering-Islam.org

Islam and Christianity are forever diametrically opposed

A tenet of Islam is that both Mohammed and Jesus of Nazareth were both Muslims. Islam says both were prophets sent by Allah. If this were true, then it is mandatory that these two great prophets must coincide exactly in all points and never contradict each other. Did not the same Allah send both of them? Then, aren't even the smallest of contradictions between the two, very big red flags? And there are a great many, which you will see below. Christianity and Islam are necessarily forever diametrically opposed to one another, just as evil and good are. Oral confession of the deity of Jesus Christ is prerequisite to becoming a Christian (Romans 10:9-10). To a Muslim, this is blasphemy. To a Christian it is blasphemy to not attribute divinity to Jesus the Christ. The New Testament could not be clearer on this subject. The heart, core and soul of Christianity is allegiance to Jesus Christ as God, Lord, and Savior! Were Jesus Christ who the Muslim Qur'an who it makes him out to be, then Christianity would be blasphemous and baseless.

That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved. For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation. (Romans 10:9-10)

Surah 5:68 - Say: "O People of the Book! ye have no ground to stand upon unless ye stand fast by the Law (Torah), the Gospel (Injeel), and all the revelation that has come to you from your Lord."

Surah 29:46 Muslims are told by Allah, not to question the authority of the scriptures of the Christians, saying, "And dispute ye not with the People of the Book, but say, "We believe in the revelation which has come down to us and in that which came down to you; Our Allah and your Allah is one;

Islam says that Jesus did not die. So, again --Islam has proven to be false; because Muhammad claimed the Gospel is true, and all 4 Gospels (Injil) testify that Jesus died and rose from the dead. God does have a begotten Son (not made, but one with the Father), which Islam denies. The Jewish Torah / Taurat (Tawrat) clearly indicated this over 1000 years before Muhammad and Islam. In addition their are collateral 1st century sources that testify that Jesus was put to death. In the "Annals" written by Roman historian Tacitus, in Book XV, Chapter 44 we read "Christus, the founder of the name, was put to death by Pontius Pilate, procurator of Judea in the reign of Tiberius." Roman historian Josephus also wrote about the death and Resurrection of Jesus. Even Satan says that Jesus died on the cross. Also, the Roman Historian Seutonius wrote in his work "Life of the Emperor Claudius" the following about Christians: "and deny the gods of Greece, and worship the crucified sage, and live after his laws." The Roman historian Pliny wrote about Jesus' death in Book X of his Epistles. Julius Africanus, quoting Thallus another Roman historian, who wrote in about 52 A.D. about the miraculas happenings the day the Son of God was killed. He wrote: "On the whole world there pressed a most fearful darkness; and the rocks were rent by an earthquake, and many places in Judea and other districts were thrown down". Like Muhammad, Satan also cringes in fear at the sight of the cross. Read this true Exorcism here.

Proverbs 30:4 (700 B.C.): "Who hath ascended up into heaven or descended? Who hath gathered the wind in His fists? Who hath bound the waters in a garment? Who hath established all the ends of the Earth? What is His name, and what is His son's name, if thou canst tell?"

(Psalm 2:11-12) Serve the LORD with fear, and rejoice with trembling. Kiss the Son, lest he be angry, and ye perish from the way, when his wrath is kindled but a little. Blessed are all they that put their trust in him.

Even after Allah confirmed the Torah and Gospel, Islamic Mullahs and Imams have tried to sell the lie that the Christian Gospels and Jewish Torah have been corrupted.

This a complete lie! This lie is perpetuated by Islam, because of all the historic, scientific, and simple mathematical errors in the Koran/Qur'an - as you'll see below... The Qur'an just doesn't add up.

"They" could not have changed the Christian Gospels after Muhammad, since there are 5,735 (Welte, 2003) manuscripts of the whole or part of the Greek text of the New Testament (Injil) pre-dating Muhammad still in existence. Worldwide, there are 24,800 copies of these original manuscripts. These include the Codex Vaticanus (325-350 AD) located in the Vatican library and the Codex Siniaticus (350 AD) located in the British Museum. There are also 80,000 quotations in the works of early Christian writers which are so extensive that the New Testament could virtually be reconstructed from them without the actual New Testament documents. Then there is the obvious fact that the Christian Gospels were so widely distributed both before and after Muhammad, that any attempt to change (add/subtract) something in the Christian Gospels would have resulted in immediate discovery and condemnation. Additionally, the New Testament was handed down from apostolic times and its genuineness was guarded by Christian churches, and it was zealously watched by enemies of Christianity. A very wide protest would have resulted from both sides were it tampered with. Likewise, the Septuagint edition of the Old Testament was always in the hands of both Christians and Jews, both rivals in religion. Any attempts to change this by either side would have been vigorously attacked.

There are four more "safeguards" for the integrity of the Bible. (1) Jesus Himself read from Isaiah scroll in a Synagogue in Nazareth and declared it as Scripture (inspired from God), Luke 4:16-21; (2) The Dead Sea scrolls, found in 1947, verified the Jewish Torah back to 100 AD to 200 BC, when they were copied. Prior to this discovery, the oldest Torah dated to the 9th century AD. The Dead Sea scroll of Isaiah verified almost exactly the Isaiah scroll copied in the 9th century; (3) Early Church Fathers like Ignatius, Clement of Rome, Clement of Alexandria, Tertullian, Irenaeus, who wrote from between 90-160 AD all cited in their writings Christian Gospel accounts (Guthrie, 1990, page 24); (4) We know that the writings of Moses were preserved as far back as 621 BC. 2 Kings 22 speaks of this at the time of the Israeli King Josiah. Ezra 7:14, Nehemiah 8:1-18, and Jeremiah 36 also speaks of the Jews maintaining Scripture.

Some versions of the Bible from 1881 differ in a few words here and there. However, the essential theological points remain the same and are complete. Bibles we recommend, that have not changed are: Protestants original Authorized King James (1611), Catholics Catholic Douay Reims - older versions

The Christian Bible predates Muhammad and Islam by more than 575 years. The Jewish Torah predates Muhammad and Islam by 1,000 - 3,000 years. Muhammad said for Muslims to read the Bible for "Guidance and Light." For Islam to say they are corrupted, then is to call Muhammad a liar for recommending it.

The same Bible Muhammad would have seen (if he ever did) is in both (1) The Vatican (Codex Vaticanus) and (2) British Museum (Codex Sinaticus). It is all there, including Jesus dying on the cross as atonement for our sins. And, His resurrection, and ascension into heaven - in front of many witnesses. The New Testament is preserved in almost perfect condition in these two Greek texts which both predate Muhammad and Islam by over 200 years.

Everything in the Christian/Jewish Bible is being authenticated by archeology. Consider the Babylonian cylinder inscription of Nabonidus (thought to be the last king of Babylon) which commemorates the reconstruction of a ziggurat at Ur by Nabonidus and records a prayer to Belshazzar (Daniel 5) his son 'the firstborn son, the offspring of my heart'. Not only does this prove that Belshazzar was indeed a member of the Babylonian royal family, which had long been disputed, but it also explains why Daniel is told he could be the third ruler (with Nabonidus and Belshazzar more or less acting as co-regents). Also, consider the 'chariot wheels' divers found in the Red Sea, proving the Hebrew Exodus from Egypy was real; and that the Egyptian army chasing the Jews was drowned by God (Yahweh), just as was recorded in the Jewish Bible.

Muslims should note that nowhere in the Qur'an there is even a suggestion that the Christian Biblical text has been altered or corrupted. The word "tahrif" is never used with reference to the Christian Gospels (Injil). The Qur'an occasionally accuses the Jews of altering their Scripture (like in Surah 5:13); but it never levels this accusation at Christians. It in no way implies that the text of the Gospel of Jesus (Injil) has been corrupted. In fact, the Qur'an attests to the validity of the Christian Gospels, Zabur (Psalms) and the Torah.

The uninspired Qur'an

The Jewish and Christian Bibles were written by "inspired men of God" who immediately committed God's Word to writing. Islam doesn't even have either an original or inspired Qur'an. The Muslim Qur'an was made up supposedly from "memory" from those who supposedly committed the words of Muhammad to memory, and from a few scraps found under a bed. This was originally begun about 15-20 years after Muhammad died at his wife Ayish's home in Medina, and he was lowered into a hole in the ground, where he remains. The compilation was not finished until at least 150 years after Muhammad's death. This "hearsay" argument seriously brings the credibility of the Qur'an into question. But, that's only the beginning. All the errors, including simple mathematical and historical errors you will see in the Qur'an below renders it impossible to be a divine revelation.

Al Bukhari, a Muslim scholar of the 9th-10th century, and the most authoritative of the Muslim tradition compilers, writes that whenever Muhammad fell into one of his unpredictable trances his revelations were written on whatever was handy at the time. The leg or thigh bones of dead animals were used, as well as palm leaves, parchments, papers, skins, mats, stones, and bark. And when there was nothing at hand the attempt was made by his disciples to memorize it as closely as possible.

Zaid b. Thabit said: “The Prophet died and the Qur’an had not been assembled into a single place.” (p. 118, Ahmad b. `Ali b. Muhammad al `Asqalani, ibn Hajar, "Fath al Bari", 13 vols, Cairo, 1939/1348, volume 9, page 9)

Zuhri reports, 'We have heard that many Qur'an passages were revealed but that those who had memorized them fell in the Yemama fighting. Those passages had not been written down, and following the deaths of those who knew them, were no longer known; nor had Abu Bakr, nor `Umar nor `Uthman as yet collected the texts of the Qur'an.

“During the battle of Yamama, 450 reciters of the Quran were killed.” (The True Guidance, An Introduction To Quranic Studies, part 4 [Light of Life - P.O. BOX 13, A-9503 Villach, Austria], p. 47- citing Ibn Kathir’s Al-Bidaya wa al-Nibaya, chapter on Battle of Yamama).
Muhammad's child wife said this after Muhammad died:

"The verse of the stoning and of suckling an adult ten times were revealed, and they were (written) on a paper and kept under my bed. When the messenger of Allah expired and we were preoccupied with his death, a goat entered and ate away the paper."

References: Musnad Ahmad bin Hanbal. vol. 6. page 269; Sunan Ibn Majah, page 626; Ibn Qutbah, Tawil Mukhtalafi 'l-Hadith (Cairo: Maktaba al-Kulliyat al-Azhariyya. 1966) page 310; As-Suyuti, ad-Durru 'l-Manthur, vol. 2. page 13

As to the Taurat (Torah), Jewish scribes painstakingly copied it via a system of checking, double checking and adding each letter on each line. Any attempt to change something in the Torah would have resulted in immediate discovery and condemnation. And copies of the Torah from around the world agree exactly. Thousands of the Hebrew Old Testament manuscript copies are still available for textual criticism, ranging in age from the second century B.C. (Before Christ) to the eleventh century A.D. (After Christ).

Source: True History of Islam, Mohammed an the Koran

Racial Hatred Arrest for Internet Blogger

LionHeart UK

THE END.

Posted: 23 Jul 2008 07:36 AM CDT
I was due to attend Greyfriars Police station today to answer bail regarding my arrest on ‘suspicion of stirring up racial hatred’ through written material on this blog.

I was advised by my solicitor/lawyer yesterday that he had spoken to DC Holden regarding my attendance at the police station today and he told him that a decision still had not been made concerning me and my case so they are going to be bailing me for a further few months.

So the leash is still around my neck, but it’s more of an extendable leash now, like the one you put your dog on so they can run a little further, rather than a chock chain.

I lost everything because of the drug dealing gangs of Pakistani Moslems from Luton, my home, by business, my way of life and over 18 months of my life.

And I thank God daily for it because my blog now stands as a testimony for others to read about what is going on in Luton & Dunstable, which is Al Qaeda’s frontline within Great Britain, and the Islamic community that has set up camp there.

There are many cowards out there who disrespect me but just remember you’re the one who ran away not me, I’m just taking a rest now.

Let’s not forget that Luton played a central role on 7/7 and during ‘operation crevice’ the biggest anti-terror operation in British history which saw the bomb maker of the plot who was a taxi driver from Dunstable wanting to buy a dirty bomb from the Russian mafia in Belgium, and the Emir of the plot who was also said to be the recruiter of the lead bomber on 7/7 Mohamed Siddique Khan also another Pakistani Moslem known as Q from Bury Park Luton.

All these known factual links to International Islamic Terrorism and Al Qaeda’s War against Great Britain from this one locality of Luton.

My blog is an on the ground assessment of what is happening on the streets of Luton & Dunstable with regards to the paramilitary force of British born Pakistani Moslems, and then beyond what is happening on the streets, out of sight and mind.

Blended into the Bury Park community of Luton, living in the shadows is Al Qaeda in Britain, trained courtesy of Osama Bin Laden and the terror camps of Afghanistan/Pakistan who are now recruiting and commanding their Moslem brothers on our British streets.

Jihad (Holy War) against us and our way of life for Islam is their message.

By the time the British State have decided what they want to do with me I will have lost another year of my life to them, having the stress of these legal proceedings hanging over my head, and then I could lose another year if they finally decide to charge me and all for writing and telling people what I see with regards to Islam’s War within Great Britain and against our Western Civilisation, and calling Moslems savages.

As an uneducated man and not politically correct I think savages fits them quite well after watching beheadings, suicide bombings on buses and trains, flying planes into towers, chopping off peoples limbs for the most trivial of offences, the hatred that is aimed at those outside of the religion, and the hatred towards women and homosexuals and all because of the teachings of the religion. The list could go on and on, these are just a few examples that spring to mind of why I call Moslems savages.

The politically correct term for those who have jobs and careers to protect is - Terrorist

Ok not all Moslems act in that way but if they class themselves as Moslems by carrying the label and embracing the religion then they condone what is at the core of the religion which is the teachings of a 7th Century barbarian who was a bloodthirsty warmongering child molesting paedophile false prophet rapist.

Many who claim the label ‘Moslem’ only do so because it has been passed down from the generations, they don’t know the true heart and soul of the religion because they have never delved into the deepest depths of the pit of the religion. Those who do know the heart and soul are the religious Moslems who are committed to furthering the agenda of the Islamic religion in Great Britain and are the driving force.

Those who profess moderation and peace are a different side of the same coin they just have a different way of achieving the end time goal which is Islamic Rule upon the British Isles. This is the mandate of the Islamic Religion that all Moslems if they are true Moslems must adhere to and carry out, those who profess moderation and peace are taking the long term approach and those conducting Holy War are taking the faster approach, but both have the same end result in mind and they both work in tandem together.

So don’t believe the lies.

If a Moslem doesn’t want to live under Sharia Law then he/she is not a Moslem, it is like me as a Christian saying I don’t believe in Jesus, its that simple, and we have 3+ million Moslems in our Country.

Those who carry the label ‘Moslem’ but know nothing about the heart and soul of the religion know in the back of their minds that if they reject the label then they face a death sentence from religious Moslems as an act of apostasy which is one of the most abhorrent things imaginable and has no place within our civilized society but as with many other things it is an integral part of the Islamic religion.

If a Moslem leaves the religion he/she must be murdered for this offence, and there are many willing Moslem murderers out there willing to please Allah by shedding Apostate blood.

Those who leave Islam should find a place of safety and sanctuary within our land, and the Church is the place where you will find it, then you can break off the shackles that bind you and receive the Love of Jesus Christ from His servants, those like Bishop Nazir Ali who knows all to well about Apostasy among many other things within Great Britain.

He himself is now a target of the military wing of Islam because he dared speak out on behalf of the British people about the Islamification of Great Britain; does this not tell you something that everyone who speaks negatively about Islam has to live under fear of death?

And this is supposed to be a civilized 21st Century democracy in which we live.

No wonder there are so many cowards out there, but what does the future hold for our children and grandchildren with so many cowards in society who are doing nothing about those who are seeking to destroy all of our futures?

We cannot escape the facts in today’s British society and what they mean to our futures although this present government would like to sweep them under the carpet by saying ‘Islam means peace’, ‘Moslem and terrorist are two words that don’t go together’, ‘Islamic terror is anti-Islamic activity’, and it’s a small minority, so as to dupe the gullible British sheep people into a false sense of security by believing the lies about Labours block vote and their pet project, the British Islam they are foolishly trying to create like the deranged Liberals that they are.

You can hear the Islamic World laughing at these spineless treacherous traitors as they take over our Country, who are leading Great Britain into the gutter, surrendering and appeasing at every opportunity to save their cowardly necks from the inevitable, even giving the Islamic Kingdom of Great Britain their first State sanctioned building blocks for their own autonomy upon our Island, and releasing Al Qaeda terrorists back out into our society.

The Liberal Elite and the Islamic Kingdom of Great Britain are working together towards the destruction of the British homeland and the ancient ‘Realm’ in which we have lived for generations in their quest for the unachievable utopian multi cultural dream which is nothing more than social psychosis being inflicted upon British society by those patients with the disease of Liberalism who are now in charge of the Asylum which is Great Britain who have tried their Marxist social engineering project on our society at our expense while they sit back in their tax paid ivory towers.

Over our dead bodies our enemies will have to climb to defeat and destroy the ‘Realm’ is the message from the British people, I am just one of many across the land; we will not let the sacrifices our forefathers made for us be in vain, we will fight for righteousness for the sake of our children and grandchildren who are relying on us.

I put one question to you here; what are you doing about the future for your children apart from sitting on your big behind watching TV, filling your store house for the uncertain future the World faces, and complaining about 21st Century British life.

”What does it profit a man if he gains the whole World yet forfeits his own soul”

Why not make a conscious decision today to do something, even the smallest of things because it is the smallest of things that go towards the bigger picture, just like each individual brick played in building Rome.

’Evil prevails when good men/women do nothing’

If you have read this then the decision is in your hands, decide to act and make a difference in this World in which you live or go back to your cowardly dark slumber that you believe is light because of what it contains and live out the rest of your days under the Lord God Almighty’s gaze but void of His shadow over your life because you reject to help defend His kingdom on Earth, and the innocent, weak and vulnerable people who are relying on those who God has ordained to hold back the darkness.

You are reading this for a reason, each and every person who clicked on this blog today and every other day.

Osama Bin Laden is the Anti-Christ who seeks to defeat America and destroy Christendom in the War he has declared on behalf of Islam, and the Islamic Republic of Iran are seeking Nuclear bombs so they can wipe Israel from the Earth.

How long until the world in which we live changes again forever with this present global conflict going to the next level and phase?

The Islamic Civilisation v The Judeo/Christian Civilisation – Nuclear War

Them or us no middle ground, are you playing your part or are you one of those people in denial of the truth, consumed with other meaningless things pertaining to daily life which are so insignificant in the scale of the bigger things happening within life on Earth.

What will be living through the coming Apocalypse be like and are you preparing?

As I will not be posting on this blog again and I do mean it this time, there is a facebook group that I have set up that needs some life brought into it so I would ask that those who have contributed here will come and contribute there and bring some life to the group.

It’s up to you though.

There is 18 months worth of video’s, writings, facts, opinions and beliefs on the pages of this blog, so there is enough for people to read who arrive here, and if the police have not got enough to charge me yet based on my whole blog then is it not about time they let me go so I can get on with my life?

These extra few months are not going to change anything, its not like I am going to wake up one morning and start telling people to burn out the Islamic Kingdom and hang the British traitors who are against us from London bridge is it?

My beliefs and opinions are on each page of this blog and I have never once called for murder or violence against others, so why was I arrested?

I breached ‘community cohesion’, and how dare British citizens breach ‘community cohesion’, those newly formed racial hatred units in the police force need to show some work for their funding after all so I was viewed as an easy target for the detected crime statistics considering I was open and honest on my blog.

”Touch not my prophets and do my anointed no harm”

Do the British State want to make me a martyr for my words? They know I would accept it gladly because to be a martyr in any form as a Christian is the highest calling God can place upon our heads and that includes dying for our faith. The only thing different between a Christians joy of dying for his/her faith is that they die out of love for others, where as Moslems die to kill others.

No Christian would ever commit suicide to murder others that it mass murder plain and simple, but Moslems based on their religion wrap it up as martyrdom with the prize of 72 Virgins for their actions.

Islam is nothing more than a creation of the devil as the facts emanating from its heart and soul clearly show, and those who cannot see it are blinded by a different form of devil.

Although I have enjoyed writing my point of view about the Jihad for others to read and hopefully shed some light for those who could not see, blogging does not put food on the table or a roof over your head, and those things are more important to me than writing words for others to read at this point in time.

I will be back at some point in the future but not on this blog, this blog is now finished.

A book is on its way as long as someone will dare publish it and of course you will be in it, my avid readers from Bury Park, how rude would it be of me not to mention you for the world to read after everything.

You think your something because you hunt in packs and have instilled fear in people because of your willingness to commit brutal acts of violence and murder but in reality you aint all that, you just have had longer time to prepare for what is happening now because the British people were oblivious to you and your Islamic intentions.

Now though things are loud and clear.

You switched the light of Almighty God upon yourselves the day your threatened my life. He knew exactly what was going to happen in Great Britain and in Luton & Dunstable that’s why He chose me to let the light of heaven shine through me into the darkness where you devils from the pit inhabit that threaten His people and Kingdom on Earth. I am called and anointed as every other Christian is, to live and serve under His shadow, so how dare you devils in the embodiment of Moslems from Bury Park threaten the Lord’s anointed, a servant and ambassador of Heaven, I serve the King, so take note of your brother Bobby Khan because God knows who each of you are, the very hairs on your head are numbered.

There will be nothing said or done in the darkness that will not be brought out into the light.

One will chase a thousand and two ten thousand and I alone have chased and surrounded the first thousand of you, with you now surrounded on all sides with no where for to run or hide because you sit in your small encampment upon my land, the land my forefathers built for me, so what a liberty for you, our guests to throw our hospitality back in our faces by declaring war, committing acts of war and seeking to take over.

What did you think the response would be?

And those Al Qaeda in the shadows who are nothing more than psychologically twisted human beings who need their perception of life reconfigured now know who I am, and it is my pleasure to say come get me, just like I said to the cowardly London flag burners, before the thief come gets you.

You started this, the line in the sand was drawn, you crossed it, and believe me God will finish it.

I can only say open that dark twisted mind, let a little light from above in and repent of your actions, open your heart and allow Jesus Christ the light of life into your life, and into your dark Islamic heart before it is too late for you whoever you are, wherever you are, and your eternal soul ends up in the true lake of fire.

We cannot both be right!

Lionheart of England

P.S I have one more thing I am waiting to post which I have been waiting on for about 4 months, so if it does finally arrive as ‘old news’ then I will post it, so keep checking back, and if not then God knows and its in His hands.

It is “All for the Glory of God” after all.

I am the Lord, that is my name; And my glory I will not give to another’ nor my praise to carved images.

Any posts that I do make from now on that I think are important will be posted on Radarsite.